Игрок 6087·Не рекомендует·31 ч в игре

I was SO excited for this game. But alas, on launch day my disappointment was immeasurable and my day was ruined. Why, you may ask, is that so? Well, the TLDR is that the game is 10x buggier and clunkier than it was in the demo. But if you must know the details, here you go: - BUGS AND PERFORMANCE! Put simply, the game is a mess. About 6 months ago for the demo the game ran nearly perfectly with zero issues. Now, even on the lowest settings it regularly freezes and crashes. Furthermore, there are endless bugs. Troops will sometimes not draw supplies, or will continue to execute old orders for no clear reason. When you load a save, or combine divisions, it will delete your next phases of battleplans. If you drag units from one zone to another it will mess up the chain of command. The fact they released this game in this state is astonishing. - TIME CONTROL! THIS, above any other gameplay feature, needs to be changed IMMEDIATELY. Time automatically starts at max speed when you load a save. If you make a new battle plan, the game immediately unpauses and reverts to your last speed, even if you made a slight error and need to redo it, needlessly wasting time and potentially thousands of lives. The game doesn't automatically freeze time when you go into menus, it also doesn't freeze time when it shows vital pop ups that block a lot of the screen. This is such a simple thing to get right that was COMPLETELY changed from the demo for no reason. I'm flabbergasted by this. - UI! This was an issue even in the demo. The organization chart in particular would be fine if you only had to organize one division with 20 units, but by the second mission you already have 9 DIVISIONS, thats 180 units you have to manually upgrade and organize. Its also buggy, so changes may revert, or things can glitch and create messed up chains of command, which is EXTREMELY annoying to fix because you have to look through hundreds of tiny units with nearly invisible connections on the org chart. Overall, the UI is just clunky to the point where I'm often not sure if something is a bug or just an awful design decision. - COMMAND! This is the least changed aspect from the demo, but the changes they did make are for the worse. They added a zone system that is on by default, requiring you to manually split units off into different formations to perform even the most mundane tasks like scouting, or sitting in reserve in EVERY. SINGLE. PHASE. It also added a bunch of bugs as mentioned above. These changes have made commanding large formations frustrating and difficult for absolutely no tangible improvements. You can still switch back to the old timeline system from the demo (As indicated by dev below), but this system absolutely should not be the default. Overall, I'm beyond disappointed with this launch. It's like 50% of the game that I loved in the demo was removed and replaced with an unstable mess. I will not recommend this game until they fix these issues.

Игрок 8129·Рекомендует·4 ч в игре

Disclosure: I was in the closed beta (different account) and have played dozens of hours already. This is an excellent game. It's not perfect, but it does a most things right. Pros: Big battles, detailed map. Drawing on map is fun. The scale and gameplay is good: I prefer the once-a-day planning. I set the plan, then watch it play out (sometimes disastrously). Watching your troops move forward, engage, push the frontlines, surround and encircle is hypnotising. The photos are a big a plus. Music is good. Sound is good. Cons: Mostly technical. Framerate tanks in larger missions. Troop management page gets laggy when too many units. Loading saves a bit buggy. No mod support. Aircraft are a bit weak. Hopefully patches will fix the above issues.

Игрок 4432·Не рекомендует·2 ч в игре

I was looking forward this game very very much. first 4 missions were fine there were some performance drops but it was playable. But on misison 5 I coundt start the mission! And bugs were there and here, it was very bad. So without able to finish the mission and play the game here I am writing this review. I love core gameplay but bugs and performance are breaking it all apart. I am not refunding the game but I really hoping for critical fixes in next week.

Игрок 1855·Рекомендует·4 ч в игре

浅尝一番，一句话概括为，机制新颖的策略游戏。 游戏聚焦于宏观层面的战略指挥，包括补给的规划，计划的制定以及战略的规划，相较于市面上那些比较成熟的大战略作品，这款作品的轻量化做的非常优秀，其AI自主性很强，完全可以制定计划后让AI去执行，游戏本身没有什么问题，AI也还算智能，对于喜欢策略游戏，尤其是注重宏观策略的玩家来说，是可以尝试的优秀作品。 从缺点上来说，补给机制较为简陋，建模粗糙，但这些都无伤大雅，由于游戏现在没有中文，在中文版出来之前，可以使用中文补丁，这里的精修版补丁鸣谢@Kirisame Marisa 大佬通宵对旧的汉化补丁进行了汉化精修和程序优化，后续经过处理得到精修版汉化，在没有官方发布正式中文版之前都可以拿走用通过网盘分享的文件：Battleplan汉化补丁v1.0.6精修版.zip 链接: https://pan。baidu。com/s/1MNubUcbUyIKh_1Ho6m8JjQ?pwd=5655 提取码: 5655 --来自百度网盘超级会员v5的分享（句号换成点，使用方法：steam右击打开管理－浏览本地文件－将汉化补丁解压后覆盖－进入游戏－选项－text-中文）

Игрок 6020·Не рекомендует·8 ч в игре

I would love to give this a positive after the amazing showing from the original demo, but wow this game has fallen from that time. I'm going to blame this on the devs getting feedback complaining about the original systems from people who didn't get it. Because the new zones system and readiness orders are really bad. While you can thankfully turn the stupid things off (top few options in gameplay settings), both tutorials seem locked into these new options. And from minute 1 of the second tutorial you can really feel the problems. For those who skipped them or haven't played, the tutorials show small video clips demonstrating some of what they want you to do. In this instance, deploy your single division as close to the enemy line as possible. The video does this by drawing a balanced hold order close to the enemy line. Upon doing almost exactly the same thing, about half of my units moved into that order, and the other half just stayed sitting where they spawned, outside the area of the order, not doing anything. I don't really know where this game is going to take further development and bug fixing, but I would really implore the devs to focus more on the original systems than these new designs that kill what actually made this such a compelling game in its first showing. Ideally some additional teaching content for those tools can ease the issues newer players have had in understanding how to use them.

Игрок 5739·Рекомендует·4 ч в игре

As a former military planner, and longtime wargamer (computer, miniature and board games), I have to say this game is a leap in the right direction. It is much closer to the "real" thing, than many typical wargames. It is not completely there yet, but getting pretty close. Designating zones for defense and attack, then being able to define main supply routes gets much closer than a typical game, to how wars have been fought since WWI. Also being able to dynamically reassign sub units, and create task forces is a mechanic sorely missing in many games. Particularly since kampfgruppe / task forces were such an important part of operations in the European Theater. And then, the cherry on top is that the game is not too "groggy." You don't need to be a military historian to play it. Overall, I am having a blast with it. The game is not perfect however, and the UI has a few quirks. But I am loving it so far, and looking forward to more from the dev team.

Игрок 3172·Не рекомендует·6 ч в игре

The idea is great, but the execution is poor. It's incredibly hard to understand what each order actually does, even though every one of them has an explanation with a video. I still haven't figured out whether, if I set a capture plan, my engineers will clear mines and my artillery will fire, or whether I need to set separate plans for that. But when you stack these plans on top of each other, the map turns into a mess. The regimental order currently creates 4 zones, but usually one of those 4 zones ends up filled with units like artillery, which can neither capture nor hold a defensive position. The developers really need to rethink the tutorial missions, because they don't actually teach much. Some suggestions: 1. Show who does what in each plan. When I assign a capture plan, show a clear breakdown: which units will assault, which will provide fire support, which engineers will clear mines. If a support role isn't covered automatically, say so directly. 2. Make plans include support roles automatically (or offer it as an option). A capture plan could automatically assign nearby artillery to fire support and engineers to mine clearing, instead of requiring separate overlapping plans. 3. Reduce map clutter. Let me toggle plan layers on and off, collapse inactive plans, or highlight only the selected plan while dimming the rest. 4. Smarter zone assignment in regimental orders. Don't put artillery or other support units into capture/defense zones. Assign them to a support role behind the line, and only split combat units into assault/defense zones. 5. Give feedback when an order can't be executed well. For example, a warning like "This zone has no units capable of capturing" would help a lot. 6. Rework the tutorials. Right now they mostly teach through the regimental order, which itself works unreliably, so the player never really learns how the individual plans work. Instead, teach each plan type separately first, then build missions around a concrete situation (e.g., "take a mined village") and show how plans combine: assault + mine clearing + artillery support. Show the expected result, and explain what went wrong if the player fails. 7. Add a plan preview. Before confirming, show arrows and unit paths so I can see how my units will actually behave.

Игрок 1629·Не рекомендует·10 ч в игре

Идея классная - эдакий Hearts of iron, сконцентрированный на боях. Интерфейс - кактус, с нотками игр 90-х. Но это не стилистические нотки прошлого поверх удобства. Это прям эргономика. Куча квадратных окошек-менюшек, ненужные уведомления. Цветовая мешанина в игровом поле, которое еще и ограничено по периметру интерфейсом. Конструктор армии невозможно сделать более неудобным, чем он есть сейчас. Логику покупки/возврата готовых соединений я не понял. Купить можешь, вернуть можешь. Но оно пропадает из списка возможных к покупке. В боях я не заметил ни погоду, ни влияние связи, ни усталость. Здоровье, мораль, боеприпасы. Окей, никто не обещал мега-симулятор. Но, все-таки в это кампании погода исторически вносила свои коррективы. На поле боя откровенная мешанина. Артиллерия лупит куда дотянется. Авиация... А ее тут нет толком! Может быть конечно дальше по игре откроется слой величественного пятого океана... Но пока что я видел лишь разведку и ближнюю поддержку. Создать произвольное авиа подразделение в конструкторе нельзя. Создать отдельную воздушную флотилию нельзя. Насколько влияют леса/реки/города? Да считай ни насколько. Прямого управления нет и каких-то тонких решений игрок делать не может. Юниты все делают сами. Могу сделать удачно - пробившаяся в тыл танковая рота нашла штаб вражеской дивизии. Могу сделать плохо - пять рот гоняли штабную по карте. В игре логика разработчика приоритетнее интересов игрока. Игру надо прям хотеть грызть и разбирать. Многое неочевидно вообще. Обучение внутри игры никакое и раздражает способностью заблочить само себя. Без чтения руководства по игре тут не обойтись. Сама кампания разбита на сценарии. И только Нормандия. Ну... Тут твд по-проще и помельче, чем восточный фронт, западным разработчикам понятное дело ближе. Окей, покатаемся по Нормандии, и так сойдет. Нишевой продукт. В котором логика разработчика приоритетнее интересов игрока. Играть можно, но надо быть готовым к полыханию жопки. Поставлю минус.