Игрок 7971·Не рекомендует·1 ч в игре

The forest cathedral tries to be art, but it misses the mark. It tries really, really hard. Maybe too hard. There were a lot of strange decisions, and I'm going to talk about all of them (that I remember off the top of my head.) We're going to start with the premise, because the story of Rachel Carson telling the world that DDT is bad for the environment is a *really* strange choice for a video game. This isn't to say it's a bad choice. Modern history and the birth of the environmental movement are an interesting topic and it's always cool to see a story about one person heading up a crusade against greedy people. But that's not the story we actually get told in this game. This game's plot is more like the emotional cliff notes of the DDT story. DDT bad for bugs, bad for fish, bad for eagles, Rachel tells the world and dies before she can see the results of her work. Beyond that, we learn nothing of the story from real history. Aside from names and the basics of how DDT caused problems for the fish and eagles nothing about this game is in any way accurate except the end dedication cards. Next is the writing. This comes off like something written for a kindergartner. Rachel refers to every single thing she interacts with as Mr. or Ms. "Mr Chair, Ms Table, Mr. Trout, oh, I'm sorry, Ms Trout." It's a really strange choice that makes her seem kind of crazy and hard to connect to as an adult. At the beginning of the game it made me think that this game was really made for younger kids. If you're simplifying Rachel's story down to teach first graders about environmental protection, that's fine. That would make sense and I'd be far less offended. But this story was not written for children. We start in media res and this first chunk of the game is told in a choppy enough manner that you'd be forgiven for thinking it was in anachronic order. The majority of young children aren't going to understand what a biopsy is and how it's foreshadowing. They're unlikely to pick up on Mueller being sexist about her being a biologist. The story is severely hampered by the fact that most of the cutscenes are literal talking heads. It comes across as hamfisted. The kindergarten/young child vibe is reinforced by the happy bright colors randomly used on manmade objects. There's a wooden gate over there but some of the wooden poles have been replaces by random vibrant rectangles of varying colors for no good reason. At one point when you finish a gameplay segment a happy little minimalist sign pops up next to it. I'd swear it wasn't there before and I never noticed another one. But that same vibe is killed by the surrealist static that regularly pops up, the interface screw of blurriness and fog that comes up any time Rachel is uncertain or doubtful, and the random inclusion of disturbing and scary audio clips. What was this game trying to be? I genuinely don't know because one third of the time it's a kindergarten walking simulator, the next third is a horror game with really distressing visuals of dead fish and birds and weird sounds; (Not to mention Rachel is literally getting stalked by death at the end.) The last third of the game is the platforming section. Now, the best I can figure out is that this is all a metaphor for Rachel doing work, and possibly an allegorical reference to the common men and women who helped her figure this all out. She comes off as an idiot who thinks computers have little men in them solving problems. Again, really strange choices. She doesn't come across as the well respected scientist that she was, but rather a bit of a naive nut-job. Oh, and I don't think I've played a platformer this bad since the early 2000s. It's sloppy and imprecise. It's hard to control. It has way too many mechanics that get introduced in the tutorial and then almost never used again. The hitboxes are so unrefined you die by touching air, and the platforming segments themselves are so hard that even with the cheat settings on, (that the dev graciously gives you access to from the start of the game, points for that,) it's super hard to beat. They weren't fun to play on their own, they were just filler so that I could move on to the next, more interesting, story bit. And considering how uncompelling the story actually was? Yikes. The part that offended me the most though, was the scanner. You're supposed to use it to scan fish and the environment, and it seemed like a reasonably fun mechanic. It gets used about three times for that purpose after the tutorial. What you'll spend most of the game using it for is to follow the glowing pipes to figure out where you need to go next. There's one segment of the game where you basically need to use it to navgate a maze that doesn't exist through a dark, blurry field just so you can move the story along. The dev couldn't be bothered to build good level design that naturally moved me along. They just game me a terrible, clunky map. This game made me feel things. They were not good things. They were not the things the game wanted me to feel. I felt anger and frustration because this game just felt like a cobbled together mess that stomped all over history and a very real woman's legacy in favor of the very simplistic message that DDT is bad. We know. That's why it's been banned nearly everywhere. If you wanted to extrapolate that into a bigger message of how humans need to protect their environment, you probably should have said so.

Игрок 9765·Не рекомендует·1 ч в игре

This game hits the uncanny valley, in a not so great but confusing way. The title of the game makes no sense. Actually, not much in this game makes sense. I felt like I was on drugs even though I've never been on drugs. You know what else is on drugs? The pricepoint. It's way too steep for the 76 minutes of mediocre gameplay you get. I can't recommend this.

Игрок 7385·Рекомендует·1 ч в игре

this the most tentative recommendation that could ever be given. i didnt not enjoy my time playing, but im not sure i enjoyed it either. nothing is particularly bad with this game (except for the price). but its such an odd blend of game design that i spent the entire game slightly bemused. this is a walking simulator and also a 2d platformer that also teaches you some history and science and I just cannot reconcile all those parts in my mind and neither can the game.

Игрок 3359·Не рекомендует

Incoherent dialog links to 2 minutes of odd gameplay links to more incoherent dialog links to 2 minutes of odd gameplay links to incoherent dialog... ad infinitum

Игрок 2792·Не рекомендует·1 ч в игре

You can see a lot of the influences. You've got your Meat Boy/Celeste style platforming. The intersection of real world/digital world, like in games like The Witness and such. You can see the dramatic cuts and shot framing that are common in a lot of movies. The problem is that none of those things are executed particularly well. This is really reminiscent of a student film. Its got some potential, covers its lack of budget with basic camera tricks. It lacks the confidence to do anything super interesting in the actual cinematography (though it tries a few times), but instead chooses to go full contra-historical in the narrative. Like a Tarantino movie, but without making it an interesting choice, just a confusing one. I like to think of the short, narrative-focused games as "Is this a good use of time/money vs seeing a movie in a theater?" This game does not pass this test. If you got it in a bundle, is it worth the hour or so of your time to check out? Sure, why not. There's worse things things you could be playing.

Игрок 4131·Рекомендует·2 ч в игре

game is cool. visually very pretty. cool mechanic. good length where the game ends before the gimmick gets annoying. everything in the game could have been done a little better, but what's there is interesting and fun.

Игрок 2680·Не рекомендует·1 ч в игре

The Forest Cathedral is a strange game. Do not look for nuanced gameplay or an interesting narrative here. It's a walking sim merged with some 2D platforming sections, and it tells the real story of an environmentalist as she tries to uncover the effects of a pesticide. The game is more like a school project and can be completed within an hour and I don't think it justifies its pricetag. The story is sadly presented in a very amateur fashion, it's so surreal, that it feels like watching an art house movie at certain points, yet the dialogue seems to be written for very small children and lacks any kind of seriousness or believably. The main character calls items she encounters Mr Chair, and Mr Eagle, for absolutely no reason. The game looks ugly, the models and textures are underdeveloped and the gameplay is very basic. The platforming sections have no tangible connection to the rest of the game or story and I have no idea why a researcher is interacting with a 2D game constantly. Maybe this is some metaphor of the shortsighted nature of humans, but it just isn't explained properly and its use doesn't make much sense. All it does is break up the walking sections. I am struggling to recommend this, because I like games that at least try to tackle real world, historical events and I understand the challenge of gamifying a documentary and writing a series of events into a story. But the game barely works and feels more like random elements mashed together. If this were free, I would recommend it, unfortunately, it's not worth anywhere near 13 euros.

Игрок 3764·Не рекомендует

Из-за ошибки так и не смог продвинуться дальше главного меню. Предположительно, подобная проблема наблюдается не только у меня, так как обзоров на игру довольно мало. С другой стороны, далеко не все имеющиеся обзоры положительные, так что, возможно, святой Габен уберёг меня от прохождения и легко принял возврат средств. И всё же надеюсь, что когда-нибудь смогу войти в лесной собор, чтобы вкусить тот необычный опыт, который подготовил для нас автор. А пока с сожалением направляю палец вниз (только для предупреждения потенциальных покупателей).