Игрок 4318·Не рекомендует·98 ч в игре

The Gameplay is nice, as an oldschool SOS Rebellion player im quite enjoying myself. Except one thing. The AI Art is attrocious. I hoped it would only be placeholder Art until a later state of the game but no. Youre loading into the game? Enjoy the pseudo smooth Ai Main Screen. Picking a Race? here have some AI Pictures for your Commander. It devalues a, in my opinion, good game sooo much. If youre annoyed by the AI BS dont buy.

Игрок 9323·Не рекомендует·37 ч в игре

They sell Sins of a Solar Empire II: Harbinger for 30 euro's without the discount which is more than half the price of the main game. The faction doens't contain subfactions, nor does it have a dreadnought. Do developers not feel shame anymore? Even if the new faction is cool and adds new ways to play, it is a complete rip-off from a value perspective.

Игрок 3556·Не рекомендует·51 ч в игре

I clocked around 1000 hours in the original Sins game but, after realizing this game is just a remaster and not a true sequel, I waited to buy it until it went on sale. And my concerns were valid. 90% of the game is like the original prequel with some new things added, such as equipable capital ship items, planetary items and that the planet's relative position change over time. However, the reason I cannot recommend it, is that the AI is arguably worse. I played on the higher difficulty settings and it seems that they are incapable of defending their homeworld as you just need to build a large fleet and go straight for the opponent's capital and most of the times their main fleet is out on some wild goose chase, instead of protecting their capital. Which btw should be a toggle as a victory condition, as I find it stupid to "defeat" someone who still has a large fleet. And the weird part is that there are ways to protect your capital, like planetary shield items, but I have yet to see the AI actually use it. Weak! More over, there have been other occasions where the AI must have surrendered as in one occasion I had one opponent trapped in a cluster of worlds, while I went for another one. But, for whatever reason, the trapped opponent, after trying to break out a couple of times, just surrendered. So, if you plan to play this against AI, I don't recommend it. Big epic space battles, but a very weak AI which gives no challenge.

Игрок 8272·Рекомендует·59 ч в игре

It's a good game, i love space themed RTS and theres almost no games like this one right now that i can think of besides older ones like homeworld, i played back in my teenage days Sins 1 and i really liked it so i was really suprised they made another one. For RTS fans in general probably there are some small design choices that are not for the liking of everyone, but imo not a big deal, and even if ts a "flat" space surface and not real 3D so in the end like if it was just a space skin that could be ground i don't really care since the space setting with big ships that have multiple weapons is so cool to me. The difficulty can be brutal sometimes if you are not prepared, and snowballing is more common in this game than getting stalled.

Игрок 6540·Не рекомендует·305 ч в игре

I hate being that guy with tons of hours and then leaves a negative review. It's a super fun game, but since launch I've had regular performance problems, particularly in late game. I'll play for a few hours, but can't finish a game. I play plenty of other PC games, including games that are infamous for poor performance (eg, Monster Hunter wilds), but this is the only game that hard crashes. I also really don't like the balance as a PvE player. The AI is bad, there's been attempts to improve it, but it hasn't helped. Balance is tilted toward PvP (I assume, it's definitely not balanced for PvE), leaving one faction (the Vasari) significantly better.

Игрок 7597·Рекомендует·112 ч в игре

le dernier dlc trop facile au niveau des succès, comme tous le jeux d'ailleurs, le seul succès véritablement fur c'est le succès du "poney rose" quelques chose comme ça. le seul reproche pour ce jeux c'est la lenteur des devs pour la sortie des dlc, le dernier pratiquement un an apres la sortie du jeu, il faut réinstaller le jeux se souvenir de comment il fonctionne... Sinon c'est un tres bon jeu que se soit pour les graphismes superbes, les différentes races bonus et malus, etc... The latest DLC was way too easy in terms of achievements—like the whole game, actually; the only truly tough one is the "pink pony" achievement, or something like that. My only complaint about the game is how slow the devs are to release DLC; the last one came out almost a year after the game's launch, so you have to reinstall it and remember how everything works... Otherwise, it's a really great game—superb graphics, the various races with their respective bonuses and penalties, and so on.

Игрок 2984·Не рекомендует·124 ч в игре

I don't think I've played a game with worse UI than this, was typing in game chat and the game hotkeyed to scuttle my capital and the only indication was a single voice line that I missed cause a lot was happening in the moment. Would It hurt to have more on screen notifications for important things like scuttling?

Игрок 6307·Не рекомендует·179 ч в игре

Why do developers keep making strategy games that are basically solitaire? Sins of a Solar Empire II is, at first glance, a very good strategy game. It looks good, it feels good, its economic and military systems are satisfying to learn, and for quite a while it creates the convincing impression that there are several other powers in the galaxy pursuing their own goals. Unfortunately, the better you understand the game, the more that impression collapses. After a couple of hours in a match, I had researched somewhere around 130–140 technologies. The AI players were sitting at roughly 25–30. This was not because I had crushed them early or denied them room to expand. For large parts of the game, I was barely doing anything at all. At one point, an Eidolon AI had around eight copies of the same capital ship sitting above the former homeworld of an already defeated faction while its own homeworld was being destroyed elsewhere. And that is the problem in a nutshell. The AI does things. It expands. It builds ships. It occasionally attacks. It researches something. What it does not appear to do is play the same strategic game the player is playing. As long as you do not notice this, Sins II can be great fun. There is a long and enjoyable phase of learning the factions, understanding the economy, optimizing research, building fleets and figuring out how all the systems interact. But eventually you realize that the opponents around you are not really developing competing strategies. They are mostly producing activity. At that point, the game starts to feel less like a grand strategy game and more like a very elaborate game of solitaire with occasional traffic. And this is hardly a problem unique to Sins II. It is one of the oldest and strangest design failures of the strategy genre. Developers keep adding more factions, more resources, more technologies, more abilities and more interacting systems — while the AI becomes progressively less capable of handling the game that has been designed around it. The usual solution is to give it economic bonuses. That does not make the AI intelligent. It gives a bad strategist more money. What makes this particularly frustrating is that there is an extremely obvious alternative that strategy developers almost never seem willing to embrace: **design the game asymmetrically from the beginning.** If an AI cannot competently operate a faction designed for a human player, then stop pretending that it can. Give the AI factions designed specifically around decisions it can actually make well. Give them different economic rules, fewer but more meaningful strategic choices, different production systems, automated logistics, special reinforcement mechanics, whatever is necessary. The player does not need the comforting fiction that the AI is following exactly the same rules. The player needs a believable opponent. We have spent decades watching developers make ever more complicated strategy games and then trying to force an AI to imitate a human player badly. At some point, one has to ask why. Multiplayer does not really solve the problem either. My first multiplayer opponent tried to rush me. I survived the rush. He quit. So the supposedly superior human opponent gave me an even shorter strategic experience than the AI. This is particularly damaging in a game like Sins II because the whole appeal seems to be the long arc: expansion, technological development, border formation, fleet buildup, wars, setbacks, recovery, escalation and eventually huge late-game conflicts. But against the AI, much of that arc turns out to be theatre. Against human players, the match frequently ends as soon as one side believes the outcome has become sufficiently predictable. Which leaves Sins II in a strange position. There is a genuinely good game here. The mechanics are strong enough that it took me quite a while to realize just how little strategic opposition I was actually facing. That may even be the most damning thing about it. Sins of a Solar Empire II is very good at making you believe that you are playing a strategy game against several opponents. Until you become good enough at it to notice that you are mostly playing by yourself.