Игрок 7661·Рекомендует·13 ч в игре

So I love everything about what's currently in the game so far bar maybe 1 or 2 things. First, the games environment is amazing and often times has that cool thalasophobia feel of the first game, which i really like. Second, I like the current variety of creatures in the game so far. Lots of different fish/leviathans and the like currently in the game and i can't wait for more. Third, the base building is just as intuitive as the first two games and i like the way the tadpole feels when driving it through the water. Fourth, the story so far seems pretty engaging. Not much else to say on that. I like the story, creature design, map design, and how big the environment feels. Now onto the one thing that irks me a bit. Invincible fauna or invincible unharmable creatures. I understand that the devs want to take an approach that promotes non violence. However, it is very heavy handed in this game in that you can't even wack a predator on the nose with your tool to make it go away. I just think that's incredibly unrealistic to the point of breaking my suspension of belief. I understand not wanting players to just kill everything, but the fact is that even in the first two games, that's not what most players were doing anyways. Most people never killed a leviathan and most people just hit creatures to make them go away or to stop the continuous attacks. The vast majority of people were already playing within the spirit of the game. Making the creatures essentially immortal in a SURVIVAL game doesn't make a lick of sense. You have to kill the tiny fish and slugs for food and water anyways, so why stop players from defending themselves and driving creatures away the most natural way possible, with a bop to the nose or body. It feels restrictive. Like those invisible boundaries in some call of duty campaigns that restrict where you can go, except these boundaries are in an open world survival game where it doesn't make any sense. Fighting to survive is natural and taking that aspect of the natural world out of a survival game is just silly. Just don't add stasis or freeze weapons. That's how the people who like to kill the leviathans did it 90% of the time anyways. Like i can't even save my friend from a predator by ramming my tadpole into it. Ramming a probably 800 lb underwater vehicle into an animal should elicit some reaction from the animal that would allow my friend to escape without a scratch. It's just too unrealistic for a suspension of belief. Anyways, that's my little rant. Outside of the invincible everything, the game is legitamately good and i do recommend it. It's still a fun experience, but that immersion of the first subnautica just isn't there currently.

Игрок 0387·Не рекомендует·11 ч в игре

你要明白一件事，玩家花钱买你的游戏，按你们西方的观念来说，玩家应该是你的上帝。 当然，讲的通俗一点就是，玩家是你爹。 你不让你爹玩得爽，那骂你就是天地至理。 别说什么保护海洋保护生物，你认错爹了。 Understand one thing: players pay to buy your game. By your Western logic, customers are supposed to be your gods. Put it bluntly, players are your elders you owe everything to. If you fail to satisfy the people who fund you, you fully deserve all the criticism you get—it’s only natural. Don’t hide behind excuses like marine or wildlife conservation; you’ve got your priorities completely backwards.

Игрок 0885·Рекомендует·16 ч в игре

The game is far from complete but so far it's fun. My biggest complaints: - Creatures constantly attacking you and you can't do anything but take it or run away - Hammerhead calling in a tactical nuke on your base every 5 minutes - In multiplayer, every player has to get the upgrades (inventory, etc.) on their own. This should be shared, at least as a default enabled setting. - The final part of the game (probably because it's unfinished) has an annoying/nonsensical order that feels like a time waster - Scanner is not consistent to use on many hitboxes

Игрок 0338·Рекомендует·9 ч в игре

Güzel oyun ama Daha betada olduğundan çok eksik var oyun hemen bitti birde TÜRKÇE DİL DESTEĞİ İSTİYORUZ

Игрок 8596·Не рекомендует·21 ч в игре

적대적인 물고기들은 많아졌고 대응할 수단은 적고 제작진들은 이악물고 기절만 시키도록 패치하면서 기싸움하고 있는데 게임에 왜 PC적으로 패치 방침을 하는지도 모르겠고 데이터 쪼가리를 못죽이게 함으로써 뭐가 더 나아지는지도 모르겠고 유저들의 답답함만 늘어가게 만듦. 제작진들의 그러한 태도들이 게임에 정이 떨어지게 함.

Игрок 0848·Не рекомендует·16 ч в игре

Il faudrait arrêter ce style d'accès anticipé en 2026... Je vous la fais courte : il y a moins de fonctionnalités que dans le premier opus, et l'histoire se termine en à peine 10h... Bref, on vous arrête à 30% de l'histoire et il faut ensuite attendre la suite. En résumé, c'est plus une démo qu'un nouveau jeu : pas d'avancée majeure, pas d'évolution notable. Pour le moment, ne pas acheter.

Игрок 8742·Не рекомендует·18 ч в игре

Не рекомендую на данный момент из-за откровенно лицемерного пацифизма в игре. Особенно это видно на примере того же Мультитула, который способен срезать волокно с водорослей, ломать окаменелости, оставлять глубокие разрезы на металлической обшивке, но при этом неспособен даже чуть-чуть поцарапать самую мелкую рыбёшку. Боёвку, значит, они из-за этого выпилили, но возможность ловить мелких рыбок и питаться ими они оставили. Чёт сомнительный пацифизм какой-то: ты можешь жрать мальков, но не можешь нормально отбиться от рыб покрупнее. По итогу, из-за парочки психов, которые любили убивать левиафанов в первой части 100500 лет одним лишь ножом, страдают все остальные. Браво.

Игрок 9007·Не рекомендует·47 ч в игре

今はおすすめしない。 いくらアーリーアクセスとはいえ、初期ストーリーが短すぎてすぐにやることがなくなる。 まともにやれば30時間くらいで終わってしまう短さで、建築などして47時間までプレイしたがあとは放置してる状況。ゲーム性自体は面白いが、購入するのであれば製品版になってからか、あと1年くらいは待ったほうがいい。 リリースされて3か月たってなお、バグ修正とゲームバランス調整くらいしかアプデが入ってなく、新規コンテンツが何一つない...さすがにもう少し作ってからリリースしたほうがよかったのでは？と思ってしまう。