Игрок 9196·Не рекомендует·3 ч в игре

this missed the mark very hard. when you write about themes like the one this game is trying to explore, you should pay extra attention to how you present it all. on one hand, i can give the benefit of the doubt to the writer, because the "pure love that was not accepted" narrative is coming from, to put it mildly, morally compromised people, i.e. the player is not meant to believe them/agree with them. on the other hand, the game is clearly trying to paint a picture where something unique and beautiful was suppressed and eventually destroyed by the society and its rigid morals, which in turn implies that said Morally Compromised People are actually right. there's nothing in the story that shows any contradiction or even willingness to contradict this idea of "pure love". every so often the player stumbles upon a reminder that Nicole's dad lost the love of his life, and most of the time it's conveniently left out that said love was not much older than his daughter and had some sort of developemental disorder and was impregnated by a man much older than her . there are also the characters of Claire and Nicole which seem to be serving as individual examples of the social rejection and rigidity that is unfairly thrust upon the pure and innocent lovers. again, Nicole's mental decline throughout the game is barely hinted on, so when she accepts Irving's line of thinking, it seems than she's done it because it's rational and correct, not because she's exhausted and traumatised. and i don't even know to talk about the Rachel's murder and Claire's apparent primal fit of rage, which never occured again? which implies that Claire specifically hated Rachel, which in turn contributes to the specific narrative that Leonard and Rachel had pure love that Claire was jealous of? again, i'm willing to believe that all of this is just a result of the limitations of the linear story and bad writing choices, because i'm not even sure what to say otherwise

Игрок 9784·Не рекомендует

I've never been a fan of "and then everybody dies" narratives, frankly. And I'm not sorry for spoiling that potential ending, because I just saved you a lot of time and some very creepy emotional incest, among other things. That kind of ending CAN work, I've seen it, but you need a very deft hand at the wheel for writing, and this ain't it.

Игрок 9241·Не рекомендует·4 ч в игре

Journal de Nicole De retour dans l'hôtel familial, je déambule à travers 4 étages pour résoudre un vieux secret. Au début, ça va, on rigole bien avec le type dans le talkie-walkie, un agent qui me tient compagnie pendant la tempête de neige. Je ne peux pas sortir évidemment, pas grave je me fais une soupe au micro-ondes, je rallume un générateur, etc, l'éclate, quoi. Mais, au 3e jour, je regrette de n'être pas venue avec la GameBoy. Si The suicide of Rachel Foster raconte une histoire un peu dans la veine des Enquêtes du Département V, captivante, sordide à souhait, dans un cadre mystérieux, enrobé d'une partie sonore très immersive, le jeu s'embourbe hélas dans un déplacement poussif, des scènes répétitives, des objets ou actions à effectuer en temps et en heure, qui obligent à des allers-retours fastidieux. Pour les personnes incapables de se repérer sur 4 étages farcis de pièces et couloirs et d'un système complexe de passages, escaliers, corridors, raccourcis, pièces communicantes, ce sera un enfer : car on apparaît par sur la map. A noter aussi, l'effet motion-sickness probable (j'ai tenu bon) lors des déplacements à pied, qui font tanguer la caméra à chaque pas. Les choix de dialogue ne changent rien. L'histoire se déroule au fil de la marche dans cet immense hôtel, sans choix sauf à la toute fin. J'ai teminé sur YouTube, pour constater que jamais l'ambiance ne s'activait vraiment, et s'engluait même dans une lenteur crispante, comme ces dialogues qui empêchent d'agir en même temps, ces cinématiques molles comme du vieux Silent Hill -le génie en moins- ,ou encore ce découpage en journées sans sauvegarde libre, ce qui implique de recommencer le jour x ou se forcer à le finir. Personnellement déçue, je crois que je l'aurais d'avantage apprécié en laissant les commandes à quelqu'un, et juste regarder en commentant. Car l'intrigue tordue vaut le coup, mais la réalisation s'essouffle en donnant malheureusement un résultat pénible. Dans la même veine, mais beaucoup plus maîtrisé, je conseille Martha is dead.

Игрок 8152·Не рекомендует·3 ч в игре

Spoilers, though youll see it all coming from just the first minute: the ending literally sucked. it had cool potential for the most part, but dang dude. that really just blew. i suffered through two saves messing up and having to replay two levels just for a painfully obvious "body was inside the house!" ending that wasnt even handled well. On top of that, apparently Nicky must now attempt? the whole tone was that she wanted to break the cycle. even her subconscious agreed. THE DAMN GHOST AGREED. But no, random scene just for the sake of showing it. poor storytelling. you had a plenty fine average game lined up and mucked it all up

Игрок 5207·Рекомендует·4 ч в игре

One of the better walking simulators. Includes great dialogues, chilling story and I enjoyed encovering the mystery 3,5/5*

Игрок 2745·Не рекомендует·11 ч в игре

worst guidance ever. most of the time i'm just trying to find the right place to trigger the story. and i couldn't run. she walks slow like a snail. also many bugs. waste of time. might as well just to watch youtubers play

Игрок 7194·Не рекомендует·3 ч в игре

One basic design of a story-driven game is that you can resume from where your quit last time or at least somewhere quit near. But this one dose not have this feature. You have to start from the beginning of each day whenever or wherever you quit, which is quit annoying after a few times.

Игрок 4981·Рекомендует·10 ч в игре

Я понял. Но слишком было неожиданно, а потом было ожидаемо абсолютно все. я прошу не надеяться на потрясающий сюжет, но крепкие 6\10 точно. пройдите быстро и кайфово но не так, что здесь глубинный смысл