Игрок 7432·Не рекомендует·5 ч в игре

Дякую R6 Siege за появу, бо інакше це була б найгірша частина серії. Гра замислювалася як перехід від тактичного шутера до чогось на кшталт тактичної Call of Duty, а бюджет і строки піджимали, через що технічний стан вийшов жахливим. ШІ тупий і вороги не знають, чи цілувати, чи стріляти. Союзники полюбляють танцювати туди-сюди, що іноді ламає четверту стіну і здається, ніби граєш у якийсь неофіційний мультиплеєр. Такої.

Игрок 5369·Рекомендует·10 ч в игре

"Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Lockdown" is yet another title from the golden era of Tom Clancy's games, but unlike many other old Rainbow Six titles, it has many flaws and by today's standards feels very clunky to play. It still carries the same realistic art direction as other classic Tom Clancy's games, which is a plus, but it was far from being a perfect game even upon release, and today playing it can bring more frustration than enjoyment. However, if you're a fan of military FPS games with all that tacticool aesthetic and want to explore the very roots of this direction, it's still worth picking up on sale and giving it a try. It actually runs surprisingly well on modern hardware. Also we can probably hope for the series better future now due to announce of "Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Tactics".

Игрок 8624·Не рекомендует·2 ч в игре

Woah! I knew that most people disliked this game, but I decided to give it a chance anyway and it's terrible. They removed most of the tactical elements of the previous entries. There is no planning, level design is extremely linear. You cannot even change your teammates. If you die, you lose, you do not get to control the remaining members of your squad. You can still give some commands to your squad, but it's very limited, basically, "go there", "follow me", "stop". The worst thing about this game is that there are dozens if not hundreds of enemies in every mission and you have very limited ammo for your primary weapon. Unless you take a machine gun, you most likely will run out of ammo. You cannot take enemy weapons laying on the ground either... I guess it is designed in a way that they expect you to change between your primary weapon and your handgun constantly, but it's inconvenient and unfun. Also, half the weapons are useless because they are only situational like shotguns, or grenade launchers. You can only have one primary weapon for an entire mission, so you will not pick a shotgun because there will be many long distance fights. The A.I. of your teammates is awful, sometimes they do not react if someone is shooting at them, they do not hide or shoot back just wait till they run out of health and die. Their pathfinding is horrible, they commonly tend to get stuck somewhere far away behind. The grenades. You have to hold the button to increase the distance of your throw, but in no scenario would you want the short weak throw. So you just waste time to make a long throw, and half the time, you are in emergency and these slow throws are just absurd. Even the shortest "quick throw" takes ages, you are likely to be killed by the time you throw a grenade. It's ridiculous. The game is fundamentally badly designed. Even though the shooting has some fun, the gameplay is barely functional. I have beaten 3 missions and I think it's enough for me to see that the game is unlikely to improve later on. 3/10